Best Scope For Marlin 60 – The 4 Best Optics for Model 60

The Marlin 60 creates a scope selection problem most shooters don’t see coming until they’re fighting a nose-heavy rifle or watching their zero walk around the target. It’s not about finding a “good” scope—it’s about finding one that actually works with this rifle’s grooved receiver, light weight, and rimfire-specific needs. Put a centerfire scope with 100-yard parallax on here and you’ll spend all day wondering why your groups open up at 50 yards. Mount something too heavy and the whole rifle tips forward like a bad lever.

I tested four scopes over two months at a local outdoor range and open shooting ground outside Dallas, burning through about 600 rounds of CCI Standard Velocity to see which ones actually delivered. The Vortex Crossfire II 2-7×32 Rimfire came out on top—not because it has the most magnification or the fanciest reticle, but because it’s built specifically for what the Marlin 60 actually does.

My Top 4 Picks for the Marlin 60

How I Know Which Scopes Work on the Marlin 60

Testing four scopes on the same Marlin 60 over two months makes the distinctions visible in ways single-scope reviewing doesn’t. The clearest dividing line across all four candidates was parallax setting. Two—the Vortex and the Simmons—are fixed at 50 yards. The Bushnell and the Barska aren’t, and at the distances where a Marlin 60 gets used most, that difference shows up as a visible reticle shift every time head position isn’t perfect.

Weight was the second consistent variable. The Marlin 60 is a five-and-a-half-pound rifle. At 14.8 ounces, the Bushnell tipped it forward shooting offhand in a way the 13.3-ounce Simmons did not. Those aren’t subtle differences you have to be an expert to detect—they show up the first time you run through three magazines shooting offhand, which is exactly how I evaluate these. What’s in this guide came from 600 rounds over two months on one rifle. The patterns were consistent.

Side-by-Side Specs

The numbers tell part of the story—parallax setting and weight matter more than you’d think on a light rimfire.

---

The 4 Best Scopes for Marlin 60

---

1. Vortex Crossfire II 2-7×32 Rimfire – Best Overall

Why This One Solved the Problem

I mounted this scope on my nephew’s Marlin 60 last spring after we’d wasted an afternoon fighting parallax issues with that Nikon centerfire scope. Six rounds at 50 yards and it was zeroed. The difference was immediate—the image stayed sharp whether I was shooting at 25 or 75 yards, no focus fighting. Through 150 rounds the zero never walked, which is what you want when you’re teaching someone to shoot and don’t want equipment issues confusing the learning process.

The magnification range handles everything the rifle actually does. I kept it on low power for plinking pop cans at 25 yards, cranked it up when we moved to 75-yard steel. The duplex reticle doesn’t try to be clever—it’s just a clean crosshair that lets you see what you’re aiming at. I’ve used BDC reticles on rimfire scopes before and always ended up ignoring the holdover marks anyway. This keeps it simple.

Morning Session Where Glass Quality Showed

Early September morning around 6:30, still had decent darkness, and I wanted to see how this glass performed compared to the Simmons I’d tested the week before. Set up steel plates at 50 yards and started shooting. The Vortex stayed brighter as the light came up, and the image had better contrast. Not night-and-day different, but noticeably clearer. Edges get soft at max power on most scopes in this price range, though some stay clearer than others.

Had it out during a fog bank one morning in October—couldn’t see past 100 yards—and the inside of the scope stayed completely clear. The nitrogen purging isn’t marketing.

How It Actually Handles

The rifle stays balanced with this scope mounted. I’ve put heavier optics on Marlin 60s before and regretted it when shooting offhand—they turn nose-heavy and tiring. This one disappears on the rifle. The turrets click cleanly when you adjust them, and they’re resettable if you care about that. I just zero and leave them alone.

The eyepiece focuses fast, which matters when you’re setting up a scope for someone else and need to adjust the diopter to their vision. Three turns and the reticle was sharp. The magnification ring has the right amount of resistance—turns easily but won’t move accidentally.

Vortex’s lifetime warranty is unconditional. No receipt, no questions. That’s worth mentioning on a scope that might get handed down or knocked around.

Field Test Data

Test Parameter	Result
Best 5-Shot Group at 50 Yards	0.87″ from bench rest
Rounds Fired During Testing	150 rounds
Zero Retention	No POI shift observed
Low-Light Performance	Usable clarity until 30 minutes after sunset
Eyebox Forgiveness	Minimal shadow at 7x when positioned correctly

Tested on: Marlin 60 | CCI Standard Velocity 40gr LRN

Pros and Cons

PROS 50-yard parallax setting optimized for rimfire distances Appropriate magnification range for .22 LR applications VIP lifetime unconditional warranty Fully multi-coated lenses deliver good light transmission Stays light enough to keep rifle balanced

CONS Some edge softness at maximum magnification Non-illuminated reticle limits low-light use Eye relief adequate but not generous for magnums

Performance Ratings

Learn more about how I test and rate scopes.

This is the scope that makes sense for the Marlin 60. It doesn’t try to be more than what a .22 LR platform needs, and that focus is exactly why it works. For other .22 rifles have a look at the best scopes for M&P 15-22.

---

2. Simmons Pro Rimfire 3-9x32mm – Best for Higher Magnification

What the BDC Actually Does in Practice

I zeroed this scope at 50 yards on a Sunday morning in August, then moved back to 75 yards to see what the Drop Zone holdovers would do. Set up a 6-inch steel plate and used the first hash mark below the crosshair. It got me close—within an inch or so—but I still had to walk it in with a couple clicks. Once I knew where that holdover actually hit, I could connect consistently.

Here’s the thing though: most of my shooting with the Marlin 60 happens between 25 and 50 yards. At those distances I never touched the BDC marks, just used the main crosshair. The extra hash marks sit there in your field of view whether you need them or not. If you’re regularly shooting small game past 60 yards, they’re useful. If you’re punching paper and plinking cans at normal distances, they’re visual clutter.

Where the Glass Falls Short

The scope looked fine at middle magnifications—I shot most of a box of ammo between 4x and 6x and had no complaints about clarity. But when I cranked it up to 8x or 9x to really test it, things got softer. The edges went fuzzy and high-contrast targets showed chromatic aberration, that purple-green fringing you see on cheap glass.

One morning I showed up at dawn to compare this against the Vortex in low light. The Simmons looked flat and dim until about 20 minutes after sunrise. The Vortex was shooting-ready earlier. That’s the difference between fully coated and multi-coated lenses—it’s subtle until it’s not.

Lighter than the Bushnell

This scope doesn’t weigh down the rifle. I noticed the difference immediately after testing the Bushnell—the Marlin 60 felt quicker to swing and easier to hold offhand. For a rifle that’s meant to be nimble, keeping weight down matters. The scope comes with rings that fit the grooved receiver, so you’re not hunting for separate mounts.

The magnification ring spins a bit too freely for my taste—I bumped it accidentally a couple times moving the rifle around. The turrets click but they’re not as positive as the Vortex. Good enough to get zeroed and stay there, but I could feel the difference.

Construction Held Up

Shot this through three separate range sessions including one humid morning, and I never saw fogging. The waterproof rating seems legitimate. The aluminum tube feels solid, not cheap. It’s a budget scope that doesn’t feel like a budget scope when you’re handling it—the compromises show up in the glass, not the construction.

Field Test Data

Test Parameter	Result
Best 5-Shot Group at 50 Yards	0.94″ from bench rest at 6x magnification
Rounds Fired During Testing	120 rounds
BDC Holdover Accuracy at 75 Yards	First hash mark required minor adjustment, consistent hits on 6″ steel
Image Quality at 9x	Noticeable edge softness and chromatic aberration

Tested on: Marlin 60 | CCI Standard Velocity 40gr LRN

Pros and Cons

PROS Light at at 13.3 ounces 50-yard parallax appropriate for rimfire use .22 Drop Zone BDC useful for longer-range shooting Includes mounting rings IPX7 waterproof rating

CONS Fully coated (not multi-coated) lenses limit light transmission Image quality degrades noticeably above 7x magnification BDC reticle adds clutter for typical plinking distances Low-light performance below Vortex standard

Performance Ratings

Learn more about how I test and rate scopes.

The Simmons delivers higher magnification while staying rimfire-focused, but you’re accepting compromises in glass quality to get there. It works best for shooters who prioritize zoom range over image clarity. The Simmons is also one the best 22lr scope on a budget.

---

3. Bushnell Banner 2 3-9×40 – Best for Hunting

When the Wrong Parallax Setting Matters

I mounted the Bushnell in late September and zeroed it at 50 yards like I do with every .22 scope. Got it dialed in, then spent the next hour noticing something that bugged me—when I shifted my head position slightly behind the scope, the crosshair appeared to move on the target. Not enough to miss a pop can, but enough to see it happening. That’s parallax error, and it exists because this scope focuses at 100 yards, not 50.

The other scopes I tested didn’t do this at rimfire distances because they’re set for 50 yards. This one fights you. It’s manageable—you can still shoot accurately—but it’s a constant low-grade annoyance when you know it doesn’t have to be there. The Bushnell was designed for centerfire rifles where 100-yard parallax makes sense. On a Marlin 60, it’s a compromise you’re accepting.

Where It Actually Wins

I shot one evening about 40 minutes before sunset to compare low-light performance across all four scopes. The Bushnell stayed bright and usable longer than anything else. That bigger front lens pulls in more light, and when you’re trying to line up a shot on a squirrel in fading conditions, it makes a difference. The Vortex started getting dim maybe 10 minutes before the Bushnell did.

If you hunt with your Marlin 60 during legal shooting hours at dawn or dusk, this is the scope that extends your window. If you’re plinking in good daylight, you’re carrying extra glass you won’t use.

Balance and Handling Issues

This scope makes the rifle front-heavy. I felt it immediately shooting offhand—the muzzle wants to drop, and after a few minutes my support arm was tired. From a bench or with the rifle rested, it’s not a problem. But the Marlin 60 is supposed to be a light, quick rifle, and this scope works against that.

The reticle has five aiming points with wind holds, and Bushnell includes an app that tells you what distances those marks represent for different calibers. On a .22 it’s overkill. I zeroed the main crosshair and ignored the rest of the dots. They’re just taking up space in the sight picture.

Construction Quality Is There

The scope feels well-built. Solid aluminum tube, turrets that click cleanly, magnification ring that turns smoothly. I shot it through a rainy morning in early October and it stayed dry inside. That construction durability would matter to a squirrel hunter carrying this rifle through brush, even if the parallax setting and extra weight work against the platform at the bench. The scope comes with rings, which is standard for this price range.

At middle magnifications the glass is good—better than the Simmons, especially at the higher end of the zoom range. When you’re at 9x with the Bushnell you can still see clearly; the Simmons gets fuzzy. But you’re still dealing with that parallax issue at 50 yards, which undercuts the optical quality advantage.

Field Test Data

Test Parameter	Result
Best 5-Shot Group at 50 Yards	0.91″ from bench rest
Rounds Fired During Testing	140 rounds
Low-Light Usability	Maintained clarity 40 minutes before sunset, outperformed other test scopes
Parallax Error at 50 Yards	Noticeable reticle shift with head movement due to 100-yard parallax setting
Weight Impact on Handling	Front-heavy feel evident in offhand shooting

Tested on: Marlin 60 | CCI Standard Velocity 40gr LRN

Pros and Cons

PROS 40mm objective delivers superior low-light performance Dusk & Dawn multi-coated optics provide good contrast IPX7 waterproof construction and Bushnell durability reputation Includes mounting rings Glass quality better than Simmons at higher magnifications

CONS 100-yard parallax setting creates focus issues at rimfire distances Heaviest scope tested makes rifle front-heavy Narrower field of view than Vortex at low magnification

Performance Ratings

Learn more about how I test and rate scopes.

The Banner 2 delivers where it counts for hunters—low light performance—but asks you to accept compromises that matter for rimfire shooting. It’s a good scope on a platform that doesn’t need what it offers most.

This Bushnell would make an excellent Marlin 336 scope.

---

4. Barska 3-9×32 Plinker-22 – Best Budget Option

What You Get for Half the Price

I went into testing the Barska knowing the parallax was set at 100 yards like the Bushnell and the price was half the Vortex, wanting to see how those two constraints interacted at the distances where the Marlin 60 actually gets used. Mounted it on the Marlin 60 in early October and took it to the range with low expectations. Zeroing took longer than the others—about 25 rounds before I got it settled at 50 yards. The turrets felt mushy compared to the positive clicks on the Vortex, and I wasn’t confident the adjustments were doing exactly what they claimed.

Shot about 80 rounds through it that first session, mostly at paper and steel between 25 and 50 yards. The image was clear enough to see what I was aiming at, though noticeably less sharp than the Vortex or even the Simmons. The 30/30 reticle is just a duplex crosshair with four posts—simple and uncluttered, which I appreciated after testing the BDC and ballistic reticles on the other scopes.

The Eye Relief Problem

Here’s where this scope gets frustrating. The eye relief changes as you adjust magnification, shrinking from a workable distance at low power to uncomfortably short at high power. At 9x I had to get my face closer to the scope than felt natural, and the eyebox was unforgiving—move your head slightly and you lose the full sight picture, getting a dark shadow around the edges. I found myself staying at 6x or 7x most of the time just to avoid fighting it.

The parallax is set at 100 yards like the Bushnell, so you get that same reticle shift issue at rimfire distances. Between the parallax error and the tight eyebox at higher magnifications, this scope asks you to work harder than the others to get a clean sight picture.

Glass Quality Shows Its Limits

The glass is functional but nothing more. At lower magnifications it’s acceptable for plinking—I could see steel plates clearly at 50 yards and hit them consistently. But push past 6x and the image degrades fast. Edge clarity falls apart, and the whole picture looks flat and washed out compared to better glass. On a bright afternoon it’s manageable. In marginal light it becomes a problem.

I tested all four scopes on the same overcast morning to compare them directly. The Barska looked dimmer and less contrasty than everything else. That’s the difference between budget glass and glass with better coatings—it’s subtle until you see them side by side.

Zero Retention Concerns

After the initial zeroing session, I came back two weeks later for another range trip. The zero had walked—not dramatically, but enough that my first shots were hitting two inches low. I dialed it back in and finished the session, but it planted a doubt. Budget scopes sometimes have internal components that shift under vibration or temperature changes. I didn’t shoot this scope long enough to say definitively whether it’s a chronic problem, but one zero shift is one more than I saw with any of the other scopes.

What It Actually Delivers

This scope does exactly what it costs. If you need magnification on your Marlin 60 and you’re counting every dollar, the Barska will let you see targets better than iron sights. The included rings fit the grooved receiver, and the scope itself doesn’t feel cheaply made when you handle it. But you’re accepting compromises everywhere—in glass quality, eyebox forgiveness, parallax setting, and potentially in zero retention. For casual plinking where precision doesn’t matter much, it’s adequate. For anything more demanding, save up for the Vortex.

Field Test Data

Test Parameter	Result
Best 5-Shot Group at 50 Yards	1.3″ from bench rest at 6x magnification
Rounds Fired During Testing	80 rounds
Zero Retention	2″ POI shift observed after two weeks between sessions
Eyebox at 9x Magnification	Very unforgiving, dark shadows with slight head movement

Tested on: Marlin 60 | CCI Standard Velocity 40gr LRN

Pros and Cons

PROS Half the cost of other scopes tested Lightest option keeps rifle nimble Simple 30/30 reticle without clutter Includes mounting rings

CONS Variable eye relief becomes problematic at higher magnifications Glass quality noticeably inferior to competitors 100-yard parallax setting suboptimal for rimfire distances Zero shift observed during testing period Mushy turret clicks lack precision feel

Performance Ratings

Learn more about how I test and rate scopes.

The Barska delivers exactly what its price suggests—functional magnification with compromises in every category that matters. It’s adequate for backyard plinking but not much beyond that.

---

Four Scopes, One Marlin 60: The Testing Setup

I ran all four scopes through testing between late August and mid-October on a single Marlin 60 I keep specifically for scope evaluations. The rifle stays consistent so I’m testing the optics, not variables in the platform. Most sessions happened at a local outdoor range outside Dallas, with additional sessions at open shooting ground for less structured distance work. Weather ranged from Texas summer heat in the 90s to cooler October mornings in the 60s, with one particularly humid fog bank that tested waterproofing claims.

I shot approximately 600 rounds of CCI Standard Velocity 40gr LRN in total—490 through the four finalists and the remainder on three eliminated scopes—that’s the ammunition I use for all rimfire testing because it’s consistent and readily available. Each scope got mounted with the included rings or equivalent replacements when the factory rings weren’t suitable, zeroed at 50 yards, then run through multiple sessions at distances from 25 to 75 yards. I logged group sizes from a bench rest, tested zero retention between sessions, and evaluated glass quality in varying light conditions from dawn to dusk.

Three scopes didn’t make the final four. A Redfield Revenge 2-7×33 had ring fit problems specific to the Marlin 60’s grooved receiver—zero walked between the first and second sessions before I traced it to the ring-to-groove interface rather than anything in the scope mechanics. A Hawke Vantage 2-7×32 AO was eliminated because the adjustable objective’s distance marks are compressed between 25 and 50 yards—exactly where the Marlin 60 gets used most—making practical parallax correction in a hunting scenario impossible without stopping to fine-tune the AO ring before each shot. A Centerpoint 4-12×40 with adjustable objective was just too much scope for the platform—it was front-heavy and the high magnification was pointless on a .22 LR at typical distances. All three failed for different reasons, but they all failed for reasons that would frustrate anyone actually using them.

I tested parallax by moving my head behind each scope at 50 yards to see if the crosshair appeared to shift on target. I evaluated eyebox forgiveness by checking how much head movement I could get away with before losing the sight picture. Low-light testing happened during early morning and late evening sessions where I compared all four scopes in the same conditions. The data tables in each review reflect what actually happened during testing, not theoretical performance.

Get more information on how I test optics here.

---

The Scope Decisions That Fight the Marlin 60’s Design

Assuming Any Dovetail Rings Will Seat on the Grooved Receiver

The Marlin 60’s 3/8″ grooved receiver looks like a universal mount, but groove depth and rail width vary between manufacturers, and rings that clamp correctly on one rimfire tube don’t always seat properly on another. The consequence isn’t visible during mounting—everything looks tight and passes a tug test—and the zero walks anyway after forty or fifty rounds as the autoloading action’s repeated cycling works the rings loose. One scope in this test failed that way before I diagnosed it as a ring fit problem rather than a scope quality issue. Check clamping torque after the first session on a new scope; on the Marlin 60’s grooved receiver, that step matters more than on drilled-and-tapped designs, because there’s no thread engagement to keep things in place.

Mounting a BDC Scope Without Checking Whether It’s Calibrated for .22 LR

The .22 LR drops faster between 50 and 100 yards than almost any common centerfire round—roughly five times as much as a typical 55-grain .223 load across the same stretch. Holdover reticles built into most hunting scopes are calibrated to centerfire velocity profiles, which makes their hash marks nearly useless as labeled on a Marlin 60. Hunters who buy a BDC scope for the convenience of holdovers and then mount it on a .22 LR are likely to find the first mark puts them several feet off at 75 yards. Rimfire-specific calibration exists to solve exactly this: the Simmons Drop Zone reticle in this guide is built around actual .22 LR trajectories, and even then the holdovers needed field verification at 75 yards before I trusted them.

Using a 100-Yard Parallax Scope at Rimfire Distances

Two of the four scopes in this test—the Bushnell and the Barska—have fixed parallax set at 100 yards. When I mounted each one and shifted my head position behind the scope at 50 yards, the crosshair appeared to float slightly on the target. That reticle drift is parallax error: the scope is focused at a different distance than the target, and the reticle and target aren’t on the same plane. It doesn’t prevent you from hitting a pop can, but it adds variability to every shot and compounds over a session. The Vortex and Simmons, both fixed at 50 yards, produced no such drift at the same distance. Checking the parallax specification before buying costs thirty seconds and prevents a frustration that doesn’t go away with practice.

---

Common Marlin 60 Scope Questions

Do I really need a rimfire-specific scope, or will any scope work?

Any scope will mount and function, but rimfire-specific scopes set parallax at 50 yards instead of 100, which matters at the distances you’re actually shooting. Centerfire scopes will work but you’ll fight parallax error at typical rimfire ranges. The Vortex and Simmons both get this right. Worth paying attention to.

What magnification range actually makes sense for a Marlin 60?

2-7x or 3-9x covers everything this rifle does well. Lower end for quick shots on close targets, higher end for precision at 75 yards. Anything beyond 9x is solving a problem that doesn’t exist with .22 LR at realistic distances—you’re just narrowing your field of view and making the image dimmer for no practical gain.

Will the grooved receiver hold zero or do I need to drill and tap for bases?

The grooved receiver works fine if you use quality rings with good clamping surface. Budget rings will slip. Get decent dovetail rings or use a Weaver adapter base with proper scope rings. The grooved receiver isn’t the problem—cheap mounting hardware is. No need to drill and tap if you use appropriate rings.

Should I remove the iron sights when I mount a scope?

Leave them on. They don’t interfere with the scope and they’re useful if your scope fails or batteries die on illuminated optics. Plus removing them on a Marlin 60 requires tools and effort for no real benefit. The front sight post sits below your sight picture through the scope anyway.

Is a 40mm objective too much for this light rifle?

Depends on what you’re doing. For hunting at dawn and dusk, that extra light gathering helps. For daylight plinking, it’s unnecessary weight that makes the rifle front-heavy. A 32mm objective is plenty for most shooting and keeps the rifle balanced. The Bushnell’s 40mm objective is overkill unless low-light hunting is your primary use.

---

Which Marlin 60 Scope Fits How You Actually Use the Rifle

For most Marlin 60 owners doing most things with it—plinking, casual target work, squirrel hunting at typical ranges—the Vortex Crossfire II 2-7×32 Rimfire is the scope. The testing documented here showed no scenario where another option delivered better results within the rifle’s weight and balance envelope. The 50-yard parallax, appropriate magnification range, and sub-14-ounce weight address the three variables that consistently separated workable rimfire scope choices from problematic ones across all test sessions.

The Simmons Pro Rimfire becomes the right answer when hunting involves frequent shots past 50 yards and you want holdover marks calibrated to .22 LR trajectories. The BDC marks required one session to verify—the first hash hit about an inch high at 75 yards and needed adjustment—but once confirmed, they were consistent. The tradeoff is glass quality: at 9x the image is noticeably softer than the Vortex at 7x, and chromatic aberration appears on high-contrast targets. If your Marlin 60 stays mostly on squirrels at 25-40 yards, the Simmons isn’t solving a real problem.

The Bushnell Banner 2 makes sense only if you hunt specifically during early morning and late evening legal shooting hours. The 40mm objective outperformed every other scope here at dusk—by approximately ten minutes of usable clarity—and that advantage is genuine. Outside that specific use case, the Banner 2 requires accepting weight that makes the Marlin 60 front-heavy, a 100-yard parallax setting that produces constant low-grade reticle shift at rimfire distances, and a complex reticle that adds visual noise without adding value. For anything other than low-light small game hunting, the compromises don’t pay off.

The Barska Plinker-22 costs roughly half the Vortex, and it will mount on the grooved receiver and show acceptable accuracy at close range. It also demonstrated a zero shift between sessions that the other three didn’t, has a tight eyebox at high magnification, and sets parallax at 100 yards rather than 50. Those are real limitations. If the budget genuinely won’t reach the Vortex, the Barska provides magnification—just understand that most of what makes this platform frustrating to shoot well traces back to optic quality, and the Barska won’t help with that.

---

Disclosure

I purchased all seven scopes evaluated for this guide—the four that made the final review and the three eliminated during testing—with my own money. No manufacturers provided test samples or influenced the findings. The affiliate links in this article generate a small commission if you purchase through them at no additional cost to you. I spent two months and approximately 600 rounds of CCI Standard Velocity working through these scopes on a dedicated Marlin 60; the Vortex won that process, not any business arrangement.

---

Final Thoughts

The Marlin 60 has been teaching people to shoot since 1960, and it’ll keep doing that job whether you scope it or not. But put the right optic on it and you extend what the rifle can do—tighter groups, more confidence at distance, easier target acquisition. Put the wrong scope on it and you’re fighting equipment instead of improving your shooting.

The Vortex Crossfire II 2-7×32 Rimfire wins because it’s the only scope here that addresses all of the Marlin 60’s specific needs without compromise. That 50-yard parallax setting, appropriate magnification range, and reasonable weight keep the rifle balanced and focused at the distances where .22 LR actually works. The lifetime warranty and solid construction mean it’ll outlast the rifle. For most shooters doing most things with a Marlin 60, this is the answer.

The Simmons trades glass quality for .22 LR-calibrated holdovers and extended range. The Bushnell’s 40mm objective was the only one that extended the shooting window at dusk—by about ten minutes—and the weight and parallax compromises are the price of that. The Barska showed a zero shift between sessions that the other three didn’t; that’s the honest ceiling on budget scope reliability here.

Of the seven scopes I ran through this testing, the ones that created problems all shared at least one of three issues: parallax set for 100 yards, weight that tipped the Marlin 60 forward, or ring compatibility problems on the grooved receiver. The Vortex Crossfire II 2-7×32 Rimfire avoided all three. On this platform, that’s what earns the recommendation.

If you found this guide helpful, check out my other scope reviews for the Ruger 10/22.